Editing
IPCC:AR6/SR15/Chapter-4
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====== Table 4.11 ====== Feasibility assessment of examples of 1.5Β°C-relevant mitigation options, with dark shading signifying the absence of barriers in the feasibility dimension, moderate<br /> shading indicating that, on average, the dimension does not have a positive or negative effect on the feasibility of the option, or the evidence is mixed, and faint<br /> shading the presence of potentially blocking barriers. No shading means that the literature found was not sufficient to make an assessment. Evidence and agreement<br /> assessment is undertaken at the option level. The context column on the far right indicates how the assessment might change if contextual factors were different. For<br /> the methodology and literature basis, see supplementary material 4.SM.4.1 and 4.SM.4.2. <span id="abbreviations-used"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to ClimateKG are considered to be released under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 (see
ClimateKG:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
IPCC
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Page information